There are downsides to an SPV. Special purpose vehicles typically don’t have as much access to capital as their creators, since they don’t have the same credit. If an asset held by an SPV is sold, it can also trigger accounting rules that affect the creator’s balance sheet.
Legislative and regulatory changes can also affect an SPV, especially when changes to tax and privacy laws. And as a final downside, the optics of a special purpose vehicle just aren’t good. Companies that use them are often seen as either attempting to dodge taxes or worse, hide nefarious activity.
SPV example
Speaking of nefarious activity: Enron, an energy and commodities company, was described as “America’s Most Innovative Company” by Fortune for six consecutive years. The magazine wasn’t far off the mark – Enron created hundreds of special purpose vehicles to hide debt and bad deals from its balance sheet. Eventually, Enron would create 3,000 separate entities; more than 800 were located offshore.
Enron’s stock price topped $90 per share in August 2000. Barely a year later, amid questions about the company’s accounting practices, it fell below $1 per share. By December 2001, Enron declared bankruptcy, with $63.4 billion in assets – holding the record for the size of corporate bankruptcy until the next year. The failure of oversight spurred the passage of legislation known as Sarbanes-Oxley, which tightened corporate disclosure requirements and auditing accountability.
Not all special purpose vehicles are part of a multibillion-dollar fraudulent accounting scheme, of course. But smart investors will take a good look at balance sheets to ensure that if SPVs have been created by a company, there are good and legal reasons for their creation.